I need a job.

May 10th, 2012 | by | entrepreneurial life, selling

May
10

Most of us lie when we say we want a job. What we really mean is that we want money, but we think that a job is the only way to get some. Lest you disagree, put yourself in the shoes of a 20 year old looking for a job. I may be out on a limb here, but if she was offered an income for the next twelve months, without the need to get out of bed in the morning, or any other responsibility, my guess is that she would accept the offer.

Finding work is easy. But finding someone who trusts us enough to pay us for that work is much tougher. There are many reasons for this.

Firstly, I think that is because we lie. We lie to ourselves, and we lie to anyone brave enough to listen to us. I have lost count of the “out-the-box thinking, focused tactician, highly entrepreneurial, action oriented” folk who have cried on my desk. (That is what they put on their CVs and then, without seeing the irony, tell the interviewer that the last time they worked gainfully was 18 months ago.)

It is not just folk looking for work. It is almost anyone selling stuff. We claim to be excellent. It would be much truer to claim that we aspire to excellence, but fall short on occasion. Sometimes. More than we want. Often. Actually, we dream of it, but we have yet to deliver it. (This outrageous claim by almost anyone selling anything makes skeptics of all of us buyers and employers.)

The next problem is that in most countries the law strongly favours people who already have jobs. Each new jobseeker is far more risk than he knows. It is the background admin, the obligations to four government departments, each operating in its own quaint fashion, on a timescale that allows them to dawdle at will, but penalises the employer for the minutest transgression. Then it is the difficulty of firing, which is a longer process, and more expensive, than divorce.

It seems that most jobseekers have no understanding of what an employer might want. Hint: We do not employ people because they need a job, need money, or have an aging mother to support.

We employ people because they will help us keep our own job safe. We employ people who add value, who make more stuff than they break, or get more clients than they lose, or who bring in more income than they cost. Yet, in all the CVs I have seen in the past few years, not a single one – not even the ex business owners – have touched on me and what I want. (In my role as employer, that is.)

The sad part is that they can find that out about me with no more than 10 minutes of online effort. (Which, frankly, since they are asking for 10 minutes of my time to read their CV, and another hour to interview, plus a lifetime commitment that exceeds what I have promised my wife, I think I deserve.) Yep, I know that not everyone is online, but anybody claiming to be an Internet genius (that is, in fact, everyone) can pop into an Internet Caffe and find out stuff about me that I have forgotten.

Just 10 minutes inside Facebook, Linkedin, and my business webpage, and they will each know more than I knew in any interview I walked into before 2000. (A lot of interviews, and the background research took much longer, and was a lot more work.)

Having said all of this, I am probably wrong, and I am probably the only person on earth who has experienced this. This must be the case because nobody is telling folk how to find a job in a way that offers more success. So, feel free to disagree, and share your comments below.

18 Comments »

Learning about Flightless Birds and Money

April 19th, 2012 | by | entrepreneurial life, selling

Apr
19

Some things are so obvious that we don’t see them.

A simple example: Getting a job.

There are 2 ways to get a job. The education systems approach is to expand your head with ever more stuff, in the vague hope that people will rush towards your better mousetrap.

The other, much simpler, much cheaper, and 1000% more effective, but totally ignored approach is to give you a course on getting a job. A semester showing you the process, teaching you how to sell yourself, or how to polish your CV, and so on.

But it’s the same thing with selling anything other than yourself. Twelve years of formal education and I could conduct a conversation with Julius Caesar in his home language, but didn’t have any idea how to sell a life raft to a drowning man. I feel qualified to talk about this so long after completing my formal schooling. (Lots of fun but left me quite unfit for real work.)

We learned so much unimportant stuff and so little crucial stuff. Thirty five years on, and schooling systems worldwide still leave out vital bits.

I am upset, to be honest. I know so many people who have great products and services and still struggle because they have the selling skills of Mephitis mephitis.

I think that the education system needs to take the approach of the flightless Fukarwe Bird. Every now and then this bird jumps up out of the long grass to try and get perspective as it shrieks “Where the fukarwe?”

I think it would be great if somebody in schooling poked a head into real life and asked “What the fukarwe teaching?”

We teach our kids Latin, history, geography, maths, and Lord knows what else. But we do not teach them about money, getting a job, and selling. This is not just at school. It is at every level. We graduate doctors, architects, engineers who will go bankrupt because they have no clue about running a business. We graduate a bunch of non-professionals who will need to find  jobs, but we do not teach them those skills. And we teach nobody how to manage money.

Money, it turns out, is rather important. Watch the news tonight, and count how many minutes are devoted to money. (The Eurozone crisis, stock market prices and changes, interest rate changes, taxes, company results, the budget, etc…) You cannot win this economic game and they will not let you quit, so it makes sense to get a working knowledge real fast.

What the fukarwe thinking? And why, 35 years on, are we still not teaching this stuff?

Added a little later: Ken Robinson on how education kills creativity – which is wonderful viewing, as well as very funny.

No Comments »

Why are products easier to sell than services?

March 19th, 2012 | by | marketing, selling

Mar
19

Why are products easier to sell than services? And how does this relate to finding prospects on the Internet?

Your typical product is easy to recognise. You can touch it, feel it, or take a picture of it.  It is very easy for somebody a long way away to understand each aspect of what you’re selling. And, when they are searching, it’s very easy for them to describe  what they want, like a “Ford 5610 clutch cable”. There are not too many different ways to describe it. (Hint: That’s because, as a product, it describes itself. It has a colour, size, brand, model number, and so on.)

Some services are just as easy to sell. I think of them as “impersonal” services. These would include things like having your car serviced, having your lawn maintained, having your roof waterproofed, or having a blocked toilet cleaned. (Having raised a bunch of children, I became so familiar with this last service that I am godfather to the children of three local plumbers.)

The reason this impersonal kind of service is easy to sell is that the problem tells us about itself. It is a light on the dashboard, or losing a daughter in the bush covering your acre, sleeping in a cold shower, or finding that nuclear submarine navigating the depths.

The problem defines itself, and most sentient beings know what group of people to call for help in each case. We can also easily  describe the problem. And we all “know” what the end result should be. This work doesn’t have a high emotional content, and we don’t often care who does it for us, as long as the car doesn’t stop 40 km from Riviersonderend over the Easter weekend.

“Personal” services, on the other hand, are much harder to sell. These are services like consulting, training, mentoring and the like. Most of us do not know we need them. Just as we do not call a GP until that small sniffle becomes the Yellow River, or call a lawyer until that minor business setback becomes a stack of summonses.

Firstly, in its early stages most of us don’t even know that we have a problem. Even if we did, we don’t easily articulate how our business is struggling, or why we feel happier with tinfoil covering our heads. We want to use the web to research this issue, but we struggle to find useful information. We find no shortage of unconvincing people telling us that they can fix it, and if their solution doesn’t work on the tinfoil, it sure will do a great job cleaning the car.

For these kinds of personal services, we – the buyers – need to know that our supplier (consultant) clearly understands our problem, and is competent to help.

This cannot be done in a four line Google advert. Nor can it be done on a website. “Personal”, in this context, means “face-to-face”. People at this level need much more relationship than John Farmer buying a clutch cable for his Ford 5610 tractor.

But how you build that relationship online? Like a better-looking Dr Phil.

You start talking about the problem online – ideally in a space where people can see you or hear you. (Think relationship.) You give away the problem gratis. You discuss the problem from every angle, every which-way, and in doing so you show that you know the subject backwards and people get to know your style. As long as you are sharing the problem with lots of people, you will have no shortage of them having “AHA” moments. This is where, for a moment, they resonate with you. It doesn’t take too many of these before they “know” you.

Basically, you have to make your personal service as tangible as a product. In the absence of anything else, you are that product. This is a good thing, because you are unique, unlike a Ford 5610.

And once people are at ease with you, they are far more likely to pay for your services.

On the Internet, this is a two-stage sale. Rather than advertising your solution, you advertise the problem. Maybe inviting them to a gratis webinar, or offering your free PDF on the subject. Then using that intro to explain your take on their problems in as much depth as they need.

You will talk to many more people than will buy. But the key is that you’re going to talk to more people than you are talking to right now. These new people are your future clients.

To do all of this, at least online, you need a wide toolbox of skills. How to present webinars, how to create PDFs, how to deliver all of it automatically, how to save your material for reuse, how to automate follow-up e-mails, and a bunch more.

We will be doing all of this in the mentorship project starting March 27. It’s not just for those folk wanting to live online. It’s for folk with off-line businesses wanting to use “online” to get more clients.

Please grab your gratis ‘seat’ here: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/484183129 (Yes, we will be recording it.)

1 Comment »

The End of Teaching as we know it?

February 16th, 2012 | by | applied tech, marketing, selling

Feb
16

When I was a kid I wanted to be a teacher. Early on in high school I realised that there wasn’t enough money in it to keep me in the style I wanted to become accustomed to. I think it must have been in Mrs FitzPatricks class, after she whacked me yet again for not paying attention. Wonderful teacher, with an inspiring ruler. I spent a lot of my early maths career dreaming rather than doing.

And so I got lost in the computer world, before life jolted me back into consulting in 1992, and soon after  my teaching life took over. I am embarrassed to admit that I have just one qualification. It is not in the teaching arena. So it has been a long, mistake-strewn path I have followed.

But, and here is the point I am aiming for, I have been teaching via webinars for almost four years. More than 1000 hours worth. And every teacher I meet assures me that it won’t work.

This strong opinion comes usually without ever having seen one. It has something to do with not being able to see the kids. I was shy and withdrawn at school, and didn’t much want to be seen, let alone to raise my hand and offer a wrong answer so that my peers could roll on the floor in mirth. This webinar approach allows us introverts to blossom.

Although, I still recall Mr Nel inhaling a fly and showing us some strenuous dance moves as he tried to cough it out. Sadly, that kind of experience is rare in real life, and almost impossible in webinar life.

But teachers are looking at it from a very narrow perspective, an all-or-nothing one. Integrating a webinar approach early would add immense value, increasing the reach of great teachers, while easing the impact of bad teachers.

Each time a new idea arrives that is obvious to the rest of us, the incumbents ignore it. They seem so fixed in their views that they cannot see it. Kodak was one of the most memorable, going into chapter 11 bankruptcy a few weeks ago.

I actually consulted with a couple back in 1998 who wanted to spend R2million on a Kodak franchise. I told them how untimely an idea it was. They went ahead anyway. And two years later I consulted with them about saving their home from the fallout.

A webinar is just such an obvious idea for adult trainers. Let me tell you why I love the concept.

Prepping for a live event is arduous and costly. The event must have ‘heft’ – be long enough for you to want to spend an evening in my company – even if the idea I want to share is just one hour long. Then there is the cost of the venue, hotel stay, printed notes, air ticket, car hire, food, and loss. (Each time I travel I return home without something that I really liked. Items include my passport, credit cards, laptop, insulin, power supply, and the like.)

Then there is the opportunity cost, time missed with my family. And the risk that Eskom won’t play ball on the day. And, of course, the risk that I won’t sell enough seats to pay for all of the above. In other words, for a speaker, the risks are daunting.

Contrast that with a webinar. Zero risk. The service costs about R500 per month, which allows me to run as  many ‘classes’ as I want to, 24/7. No notes are needed, because the service lets me record and share a video of each session a few hours later. (That lets me build a library of content that I can share or sell.) There is no risk or cost to delegates. The recording takes care of broken connections and family emergencies.

I don’t have to make an event longer than it needs to be. It can now stretch from 30 minutes to three hours (or all day) – as long as the material needs it to be.

No travel, and my cost per ’seat’ is down to less than R1, from R400 (in JHB). Maybe I am too stupid to see why it won’t work, but in the meantime I love my ignorance.

No Comments »

Google and Underwear

January 25th, 2012 | by | marketing, selling, webinar videos

Jan
25

There are two groups of small business owners: those of us who have tried selling stuff using Google, and those of us who have not.

Today I would like to talk to those of us who have tried.

When I started using Google I was seduced by the apparent simplicity: Something along the lines of that first Wright brothers aircraft. Some canvas and string and a motor just strong enough to power a unicycle with a child on it. Point it due North and press this button, and your products would go as fast as corn during a locust plague.

But climbing into the Google cockpit is a lot like climbing into the pilots seat of a new Airbus 320. (That’s the smaller one without the cracks in the wings.) You are surrounded by a dizzying array of switches, toggles, dials, screens. It is so complex you need two drivers. And then, before you are allowed to take off, you need to get a general pilots licence, and then ‘invest’ a few hundred hours in a simulatorgetting qualified for this specific aircraft.

All of this costs time and money, both currencies that we smaller players don’t have enough of. That means that our first Google experience is more like a fiery accident than a fiesta in Ibiza.

The problem is that Google seems want more and more detail when you advertise. So do the folk searching for stuff.

I discovered this while in the UK. My wife was, frankly, grumpy after the birth of the new Carruthers. Her superstructure no longer fitted her bras. We agreed that buying a few new bras was much cheaper than going to gym, at least for a while. I suggested that my new best friend, Google, might be able to help.

“It’s not going to work,” she said. “Search Google for bras and you are buried in drivel.”"Why not search for 34E?” I suggested. (Hint for men: That is a model number, equivalent to a Porsche ‘Boxster‘, or – if you are a nerd like me – an ‘iPad2 3G’.)

She rolled her eyes at me. Grumpy wives exist to inspire men to go angling.

A few minutes later she popped her head into the study. “Got them on the first click.” she said. I was stunned, and not just because she followed my advice. So I tried to buy a few myself, not that I need them, of course. At least, not any more.

In the UK, which is very active on Google with 20 million odd people active on the web at any time, you have to search deeper than in SA. (I tried the same test in SA, and found an online store in SA that was, wait for it, “closed for the holidays”.)

That started Peter Bowen and me on the quest to build some tools to make using Google easier for the rest of us. It has been a fascinating journey.

Most folk trying to market via Google seem to be mixing their knowledge of traditional mass market advertising with their Google efforts. This works as well as cheese and onion ice cream.

Google interest-based marketing truly is unlike anything that has ever existed before. No sane marketer wants us to know that because we would all abandon media marketing as fast as real people abandoned the Encyclopedia Britannica when Wikipedia arrived.

So, next week, at 8PM SA Time on Tuesday, we will host a gratisonline seminar to look at why Google works so well compared to any other form of marketing, including Facebook. We won’t be pushing our products, but we will be showing you how some folk are getting up to7.5 enquiries for every 100 impressions/searches. Nope, that was not a typo. That’s not 7.5% Click-Through-Rate (CTR). That’s 30% CTR and 25% page conversion rates.

Book your seat here. And hold on to your underwear.

1 Comment »

Your Sales Process?

September 6th, 2011 | by | selling

Sep
06

Most firms have a fast process to handle incoming sales enquiries. And some have a fast process to respond to email enquiries, or enquiries that come from a form on their website. But most firms drop the ball when it comes to the Internet.

A phone call, by it’s very nature, is urgent. An email, which is the way most web enquiries gently flutter in, is much less urgent. (Most website forms will end up in an email.) And that email, like a newly born turtle, has to endure a hostile voyage before it reaches safe harbour.

You may have heard of Spam? This is the word we use to describe  commercial email that we did not ask for. Most of us think of Spam as the daily flow of emails we get to improve our looks, our size, and our chances of winning big.

ISPs (the firms that host websites and email boxes) tend to be a little more assertive when dealing with Spam, and in doing so tend to dump a lot of valid email into the bin, often without telling you about it. So if you ever get an angry message (or Lord forbid, a rabid phone call) telling you that you never respond, then that is probably the problem. Hint: Don’t try and explain that to your newest enemy because sympathy will be in short supply.

If your prospect works for a large bank, then there is a strong chance that their email will not even arrive in your inbox. Spam filters are very sensitive to email addresses, especially those of bank staff. This is because some enterprising web anglers, also known as phishermen, are getting great returns pretending to be ABSA and harvesting your PIN codes.

Some firms assume that a solid response by return email is the right thing to do. They bury the prospect in detail. This might be a huge price list, a PDF document extolling their virtues, and, of course, reminding you that they are committed to excellence. It seems that we all are committed, including the SA govt, every municipality, ESKOM, TELKOM, and every other parastatal.

That does not work. Imagine that you’re relaxing one evening at your local pub, sipping a cool Hansa while watching the sun burn an orange hole in the ozone as it slowly slides across the horizon towards Brazil. You’re young, single, and don’t need medical help as offered by the many emails you discard each day.

A delightful woman sits next to you, orders her own Carling, and turns to face the setting sun.

“Isn’t this heavenly,” she asks rhetorically? Hint: She is a prospect, and she’s just made an enquiry.

There are two responses to her question.

The first is gentle, not overwhelming, simply letting the conversation flow. You might offer something like “It’s idyllic, and that’s why I come here as often as I can. I haven’t seen you here before?”

The second is the personal version of a company response.
“Thank you for asking. The temperature today averaged 31 degrees. The sun is 8 light minutes way, which is about 150 million kilometres away, or 94 million miles if you live in the UK. That red sunset is caused by the light having to flow through more atmosphere which scatters the blue rays. I was captain of the Michaelhouse first 15, chairman of the chess club, and matriculated in 2001 with 8 A’s. I am single, heterosexual, and own my own house. I am very vigorous and, of course, committed to excellence.”

And then you turn back to your drink in the hope that you have earned enough points for her to pay for dinner tonight.

Chances are you will be doing MacDonalds again. Alone. And you won’t be getting much exercise to work off the 1000 calories in your Big Mac, Fries and Coke.

Relationships are like dancing. They need a touch of choreography to make them work. ‘Efficient’ is almost always in the way of ‘effective’ when we humans are involved. And like dancing, personal contact is very, very important.

It’s not efficient to pick up the phone and respond with a call. But it is effective. It builds legends. And it feeds the kids.

No Comments »

Secret to Success?

August 11th, 2011 | by | entrepreneurial life, selling

Aug
11

The secret to business success — to any success — is simple. Just get started.

Don’t worry about getting it right the first time. You won’t. The only question is how bad that first effort will be. Mine are always awful.

I’d like to believe that I’m a reasonably competent human being. I don’t have to be “the best” before I can add value to the lives of other people, or have fun. Nor do I have to be perfect. When I started, like you, I was pretty inadequate. My mother assures me that I did, at least once, soil my diapers. And on occasion, although I don’t believe this, I was apparently naughty. Yet I, somehow, as all of us do, turned out vaguely useful.

Every day somebody who has never sent an e-mail newsletter will ask me all sorts of complex questions so that their first attempt can be “perfect”. Why should it be?

My first mass email attempt was awful. Roger Bannister’s first attempt to run a mile, which would have been the first time he ran around a track at the age of seven, was probably pretty awful as well.

But if you just get started — no matter how dreadful your first attempt — you learn so much from those first stumbling efforts that your next try is 200% better. And by the third effort you start looking like a seasoned professional.

Contrast this with trying to get it perfect the very first time. You never get to look like a seasoned professional because you never get out of the starting gate!

We confuse our humble resources as individuals (and very small businesses) with those of Telkom who can afford to spend huge amounts of money to achieve a look that we all know is a complete lie. I would much rather have a more humble presentation that is much closer to the truth of who I am.

On the one hand technology is a wonderful blessing. On the other hand, it complicates life immeasurably by giving us far more options than we need. My car radio, for instance, has so many buttons that I no longer press any. Not even the button which switches it on. I long for the days when I didn’t have to make any decisions. Two knobs, one on each side of the radio, one for tuning, and the other for volume. And Mick Jagger yelling “Paint it Black”. Bliss.

No Comments »

Selling a Woman

August 10th, 2011 | by | selling

Aug
10

Before I offend you, let me explain. I use the word “selling” here in an American context. When they say “selling a client” they mean “making a sale to the client”. That headline sure is tempting, though, isn’t it?

This is a personal story with a business context.

The last time I found myself without a partner (and I sure hope that it is the last time) it seemed a good idea think carefully about what I wanted in such a person in future. I am a little shy to admit that I built a mind map (what your kids will call a spider man) detailing this perfect woman. At least, for me.

I spent some time thinking about what had gone right and wrong in each of my relationships, and made a lot of notes. Most of these were about me in fact. It turned out that the product on sale needed a lot of work.

But, by and by, I built a mental image of my ideal partner. I started with basics. For instance, I would prefer a woman. Then I thought through the detail. She would most likely be between 35 and 45. She would probably have young children. She would have a very gentle manner. She’d enjoy seeing new places. She’d laugh a lot. And so on.

This is what I had spent most of the previous two decades doing, but then it had been about building images of my perfect clients. I had had a lot more success finding them than finding the right marriage partner.

And then I went back to writing CrashProof your Business – which has since become South Africa’s best-selling book on surviving business closure. And, it turns out, South Africa’s only book on the subject.

As I thought about each attribute (her age, for instance) I could imagine many of the challenges she would be facing. At my age I was more interested in how she was handling those challenges than how she looked.

As I sat answering emails in my favourite bistro a few weeks later a showstopping woman walked in to chat to the owner. I had no idea who she was. But, she ticked a lot of the boxes on my list and a few that I hadn’t yet thought of. She was, in other words, a great prospect.

Because I had spent a lot of time thinking about her before I even knew her, I had a head start. Rather than rush up and use some corny line (“Can I help you?” would be the commercial equivalent), I did a little research.

Actually, I walked up to Sonja (the owner of Taste, the fine coffee shoppe where this happened) and asked her for the name of my future wife. Then I found out where she worked. It turned out she owned a business as well, and that gave us a lot of common ground. And then I sent some flowers with a note.

Of course, you know the end of the story. I sold a woman, as the Americans might say. Or, more properly, I sold me to a woman.

The key to the story is this: Your product doesn’t much matter until after the first sale (or date). Until then, it is all about the prospect. Get that right, and you get your foot in the door, as it were. In my case, the shared coffee at Fego. Only much later did she share with me that when she arrived she almost turned back because all she saw was a hunched old man in front of a PC.

Yet I find that most of us devote all of our time to the product. As a person that would be the focus on your body, or your degrees, or your car. And then we hope someone will notice. (If we build it, they will come, we think.)

I think it is much easier to build a picture of the folk that will fit you, and then approach them rather than wasting a life waiting for others to find you. They won’t. They’re too busy. You must take that first step. It helps a lot to have thought about what you’re stepping into.

PS I use Freemind for most of my mind maps nowadays. It runs on Windows, Apple, and Linux.

No Comments »

Sell what you have now

July 22nd, 2011 | by | selling

Jul
22

Each time I return to SA I am stunned. It is so much better than the publicity leads one to expect.

The newspapers do a fine job of unravelling all the dirt in SA, and sharing it with the rest of us. And we, over a braai or twelve, have no shortage of doom stories. From the outside SA looks close to the Apocalypse. But tourists don’t care about our fears for the future (and we have always had them). They just want a good time, and SA offers tourists that in abundance.

I think that most folk in SA don’t realise quite how tough it is to make a living anywhere else.

I have been a marketer all my life. For me Marketing Rule #1: Sell what you have now.

SA scenery is, of course, wonderful. But not unique. You’d battle to compete with Norwegian fjords, Mauritian beaches, English castles, anywhere in Tasmania, or the road from Vancouver to Whistler – all of which are gorgeous.

But…

Right now, SA has superb, world class airports. Right now, the air connections are superb, cheap, and friendly. Right now, the roads – at least those that tourists like me use – are better than most in the world. Right now, all the accommodation establishments are superb value for money. Right now, where else on earth can you get an award winning 2006 Shiraz for less than £5?

(Hint: Nowhere that I have found, but right now Mooiberg farm stall on the R44 between Stellenbosch and Somerset West has a bunch of them, as well as a ton of great wines for less than £2.)

Right now, the restaurants are not just superb, but very cheap compared to any of the countries I have visited. And, wait for this, people actually serve you at restaurants. My Norwegian wife swoons.

My personal chef (as I have come to think of him) at the new Gateway Hotel in Umhlanga, for instance, crafts a chilli, bacon and cheese omelette with so much care you’d think his life was at stake. After that first ‘Durban mild’ version, my life was, but fortunately I managed to lose three kilograms by lunchtime.

We’ve since agreed that the best way to add chilli to an omelette is to grasp one slice firmly with a tweezer, wave it gently across the top of the pan above the simmering contents so that the fumes mingle, and whisper a Zen type prayer before putting it back in the bowl with its family. And that’s plenty hot for this Cape Town gent.

That’s the great stuff you sell if you want buyers. They’re not interested in why it works, or how it works, or what the experience next year will be. They don’t want to know that the waiter dropped some food in the kitchen or that the receptionist is building a R16 million home in Verulam on her R5213 per month salary.

They want to know if the R150,000 they are investing in a three week family break in November is going to be better value than anywhere else. (It will be if they come. It won’t if they don’t arrive because our fears for the future send them to Cyprus, Crete, Spain, Australia, Canada, or any one of 120 other not so nice destinations.)

Cape Town over the last 15 winter days was warm enough to be a heat wave in Oslo, and on each day the temp has been higher than Oslo which is in mid-summer.  Yet each person I spoke to warned of the looming storm because such fine weather could not last. When we hear tourists wax lyrical about the joys of the country we feel the need to balance their happiness with our own view of reality.

As I see it, tourism can bring immense amounts of money into SA. This is money that is already being spent elsewhere. It is simply a matter of guiding it here. And you won’t do that by selling the problems. No one cares when they are on holiday.

Sell the hope. And sell what you have now. Worry about next year when it comes. And if enough tourists come, next year will be a lot better than you expected.

No Comments »

Sales Practice.

June 2nd, 2011 | by | selling

Jun
02

Things change when you have a steady flow of enquiries. I can say this because I have spoken to 50 small firms over the past two months who have found such a steady flow.

Firstly, you get lots of practice. When you are confronted by a live person once each month, maybe, it’s very easy to panic. You are so worried about losing the sale that you lose it. When you have two leads  (or five) arriving each day, without fail, you know that you can mess today. And still, two new prospects will arrive on Monday, and Tuesday, …. So, you don’t take life so sternly. You have more fun.

And with that fun you improve your sales approach. You relax and begin to listen, rather than fighting to close each sale. You no longer care too much whether this one prospect doesn’t become a client because you know that the next one will.

Number two, you get lots of new ideas. This only applies to the owner of the firm, I’m afraid. In the superb book Rework, the fine team at 37 Signals point out something that I at first thought insane.

When one client suggests something, they say, ignore it. Don’t even write it down. One person suggesting something is an anomaly. But if you are the owner you will soon notice when a few people start suggesting much the same thing. And that happened with about 10% of our clients. They have enough new requests for something that they didn’t offer at first that they have rejigged their sales model. In all cases they have doubled the profits from each sale by adding something to the sale that their prospects suggested.

Thirdly, of course, you get lots of sales. A few weeks ago I mentioned Frank Betger`s maxim: “If only I can tell my story to enough people, no matter how bad I might be at it, I will make sales.” That’s what we have seen as well.

Many of us spend our days with our backs to our clients, focused on making stuff, pushing paper, and chasing banks. It’s so much easier to just avoid clients. No tough questions to answer, awful choices to make, or mistakes to say sorry for.

But, the owner is by far the best salesperson in a firm. She can decide quickly; her passion shines through; she `feels` the problems that clients face because she has a lot of skill in dealing with those problems. This is  why she is in this field.

Contrast this with a salesperson who is in this firm just because of the paycheque, and on June 1 will start selling used cars, , or frozen chickens because the pay is better.

Just so that we are clear on this matter, I have nothing against selling used cars, passports, or frozen chickens. Although I am little bothered by those that are three months past their sell by date, and returned to the factory for a solid chlorine rinse before being declared fit to eat again.

There is one last thing to think about. When a firm has a steady flow of prospects, that venture no longer relies on the owner as much as before. Each of those prospects is, at first, a stranger. And this means that a new owner can take over on June 1, and the prospects arriving after then won`t know that the old owner is taking a break in the south of France.

In other words, it’s much easier to sell a venture when the owner is not the only source of sales. This occurred to me as I was thinking about the number of my friends facing retirement. They`re not able to sell their stake because their firms are so reliant on their contacts, some of whom go back to van Riebeeck`s birthday.

Apart from word of mouth, and that word of mouth is almost always about the owner and never about the firm, their firms have no other way of finding sales. This means the owner can’t retire. This might not be an issue for you, but there are some jobs that have a 14 to 80 age restriction. Plumbing, for instance, is not the kind of day job one wants having already spent 60 years  dealing with other peoples` shyte.

The people that buy what you sell pay for your future. The more you have the merrier it is.

No Comments »