Google and Underwear

January 25th, 2012 | by | marketing, selling, webinar videos

Jan
25

There are two groups of small business owners: those of us who have tried selling stuff using Google, and those of us who have not.

Today I would like to talk to those of us who have tried.

When I started using Google I was seduced by the apparent simplicity: Something along the lines of that first Wright brothers aircraft. Some canvas and string and a motor just strong enough to power a unicycle with a child on it. Point it due North and press this button, and your products would go as fast as corn during a locust plague.

But climbing into the Google cockpit is a lot like climbing into the pilots seat of a new Airbus 320. (That’s the smaller one without the cracks in the wings.) You are surrounded by a dizzying array of switches, toggles, dials, screens. It is so complex you need two drivers. And then, before you are allowed to take off, you need to get a general pilots licence, and then ‘invest’ a few hundred hours in a simulatorgetting qualified for this specific aircraft.

All of this costs time and money, both currencies that we smaller players don’t have enough of. That means that our first Google experience is more like a fiery accident than a fiesta in Ibiza.

The problem is that Google seems want more and more detail when you advertise. So do the folk searching for stuff.

I discovered this while in the UK. My wife was, frankly, grumpy after the birth of the new Carruthers. Her superstructure no longer fitted her bras. We agreed that buying a few new bras was much cheaper than going to gym, at least for a while. I suggested that my new best friend, Google, might be able to help.

“It’s not going to work,” she said. “Search Google for bras and you are buried in drivel.”"Why not search for 34E?” I suggested. (Hint for men: That is a model number, equivalent to a Porsche ‘Boxster‘, or – if you are a nerd like me – an ‘iPad2 3G’.)

She rolled her eyes at me. Grumpy wives exist to inspire men to go angling.

A few minutes later she popped her head into the study. “Got them on the first click.” she said. I was stunned, and not just because she followed my advice. So I tried to buy a few myself, not that I need them, of course. At least, not any more.

In the UK, which is very active on Google with 20 million odd people active on the web at any time, you have to search deeper than in SA. (I tried the same test in SA, and found an online store in SA that was, wait for it, “closed for the holidays”.)

That started Peter Bowen and me on the quest to build some tools to make using Google easier for the rest of us. It has been a fascinating journey.

Most folk trying to market via Google seem to be mixing their knowledge of traditional mass market advertising with their Google efforts. This works as well as cheese and onion ice cream.

Google interest-based marketing truly is unlike anything that has ever existed before. No sane marketer wants us to know that because we would all abandon media marketing as fast as real people abandoned the Encyclopedia Britannica when Wikipedia arrived.

So, next week, at 8PM SA Time on Tuesday, we will host a gratisonline seminar to look at why Google works so well compared to any other form of marketing, including Facebook. We won’t be pushing our products, but we will be showing you how some folk are getting up to7.5 enquiries for every 100 impressions/searches. Nope, that was not a typo. That’s not 7.5% Click-Through-Rate (CTR). That’s 30% CTR and 25% page conversion rates.

Book your seat here. And hold on to your underwear.

No Comments »

We don’t listen enough…

January 18th, 2012 | by | uncategorized

Jan
18

On Tuesday night we had a rollicking online seminar talking about selling. May I share some thoughts from that today?

Firstly, I have long thought that we talk too much in sales meetings. Maybe we do it to cover how nervous we feel. Maybe we do it because we think if we bury our prospect in detail, in all the features that our great product (or service) offers, we can convince them to buy from us. The biggest mistake we all make, I think, is that we talk too much, which leaves no time for listening.

By now you know that I have been on insulin since 1971. That means that I am chemically deranged much of the time. Too much insulin creates two challenges. Firstly, it makes you so light headed that you can’t think straight. Secondly, it makes you angry. Neither of these is very good in social situations. I suspect that if somebody were to check, there would be a disproportionate number of diabetics instigating motor accidents and murders.

So I thought that if we were to survey the group to see how attentive they were, it might help prove the point. It did.

As you are telling your victim all your facts, your victim simply isn’t listening most of the time:

  • 69% (more than two thirds) of people attending on Tuesday agreed that most of the time they are so worried about money that they’re cannot focus, let alone pay attention to some pushy sales person;
  • 26% (one quarter) were having serious relationship issues, and that just sucks the life right out of you;
  • 27% (another quarter) had health issues big enough to affect their focus;
  • 56% had other issues that got in the way of listening;
  • Just 13% felt utterly focused.

Just one in 10 people that you talk to is really paying attention to what you are saying!

If your maths is better than mine, you will notice that the numbers add up to a lot more than 100 percent. That’s because a bunch of folk have more than one set of problems to worry about. (They could tick more than one box.)

It seems that most of us would rather talk about our challenges than listen to  your hype. It was a sobering confirmation.

Then I got an e-mail from an old client who was too busy to attend. He thought he had a time management problem because there weren’t enough hours in his day. It occurred to me that there is no point in worrying about listening during sales meetings if you too busy to arrange any.

If you are not actively selling, or somebody in your firm is not actively selling, you don’t have a time management problem. You have a pending closure problem.

Clients are the only source of real revenue for any business. There are more important than anything else. I think that the moment we forget that, it’s only a matter of time before we don’t have a time management problem because when the business closes there is nothing left to do.

On the plus side, however, if you’re not actively selling, then you don’t have to worry about listening either. That’s one thing that you can tick off your list.

And finally, and this is very heartening. It’s not hard to stand out from the crowd. The rest of us do this so poorly that even a tiny improvement improves your sales results.

If you have a spare moment, please check out our brag wall here.

Click teh image to see the current SalesMotor LiveStream

As anybody arrives on one of our clients’ marketing sites, it adds them to the constantly moving list. It lists the last hundred or so searchers. The lines in green are enquiries that those sites have generated. (That’s about 100 sites covering services and products ranging from aerial imagery to wallpaper.)

The sites generate about 250 enquiries each day. I won’t bury you in any more detail unless you ask, but don’t let anybody tell you that Google marketing doesn’t work. It does.

No Comments »

Gratis Marketing Seminar Online

January 11th, 2012 | by | marketing

Jan
11

In 1992, just 20 years ago, I had to close my firm. As you might already know, I lost everything, as well as a lot of money I hadn’t yet earned. After a few months of trying to find another job I realised that there were none left. (This was during that uncertain period as SA made the transition from apartheid regime to rainbow nation.)

I was faced with starting up again. I won’t bore you with the details. But, marketing back then was a mere shadow of what it is now, and much, much slower. Sadly, most of the books I read still reflect the thinking back then. The single exception is “anything to do with the Internet“. And, frankly, the amount of hype about the web is beyond belief.

I have driven down almost every marketing road, and for a small business owner most of these are cul-de-sacs. I was thinking about this as I meandered through the south of Spain over Christmas. This was not as exciting as you might think. We were, after all, staying at the home of Mrs Carruthers’s mother. You get my drift.

Anyway, a bunch of shops were vacant, on every road, in every shopping centre, in every town. Like me in 1992, they’d run out of clients. And it got me to thinking about how starting a business is almost the same as finding a job. In both cases, all you have to do is find that first client. (Employee is formal-speak for a business owner who sells all of his 160 hours/month to a single, hopefully long term client.)

In essence, about the only difference between starting a business and finding a job is that the aspirant entrepreneur just keeps repeating the process, while trying to produce the actual goods, while trying to employ the staff, while trying to keep the govt happy, and so on. The employee, he with the one client, focuses on doing whatever makes his employer happy.

I browsed around Spain with my trusty wordprocessor – the pencil and notepad version I first learned to use in Mrs Kettley’s kindergarten class in 1963 – and I realised that, for all my focus on writing efficiently last year,  I hadn’t actually written any of those words down in a form that might add any lasting value. (I had dreamt of writing a book on startups and jobs, but hadn’t quite gotten the first page out.)

So, this year, one of my goals is to help you find more clients, even if it’s only one client you were looking for. I am not going to try writing it all down, else it will be Groundhog Year, all over again. So, next week on Tuesday evening at 8:00 p.m. – South African time – I’m going to present a gratis one-hour seminar online – a webinar – on Marketing – the 1992 version versus what you can do in 2012, and how to effectively find one or more clients.

Whether you are looking for a job, looking to startup a business, or really grumpy about the number of new clients arriving at your current business each week – you are welcome to join me. It’s gratis.

When you book your “seat” I will ask just one extra question – whether you are looking for a job, whether you are a start-up looking for your first client, or whether you are an existing business looking for more clients. Just so that I can better tailor the evening. It does not matter what age you are. My clients these past 20 years have mostly been between 18 and 81, however.

You will need to be in front of your PC at about 7:40 p.m. This will allow enough time to download the snippet of software you will need which will automagically convey my screen and voice to you. Your PC will need to be connected to the Internet via a connection that is at least 300KB. The event will use approximately 60 MB over the hour. You will need to be running Windows or Mac OSX. We can’t see you, so you may sit in your pyjamas. Heck, bring your girlfriend along as well. (That was not a sexist comment because I am not presuming that you are male. Just so that we can clear the air.)

I think that it is challenging times like these which bring out the best in us. We are inspired to find other, usually better ways of doing things. I’d like to help. You can help too, by sharing this invite with anyone you know who fits the spec outlined above. They will thank you. So will I.

Please book your seat here.

No Comments »

The best advice I ever got.

December 7th, 2011 | by | entrepreneurial life

Dec
07

I don’t know about you, but I feel that I must be getting old.  I am still trying to recover from my birthday in February, which turns out to be rather a long way back, but seems like yesterday.

The speed with which this year year hurdled past is matched only by the speed with which the economy worldwide has collapsed.  Except in China, of course.

But as we get closer to Christmas, and hopefully snow, it occurs to me that the single biggest regret I have in life is not that I haven’t yet reached my goal of retiring rich.  Or that I’ve given up on that, and just surviving to retirement age is the new target.

Nope, my biggest regret is that I have spent the past 35 years focused in the wrong direction.  No matter what business books tell you, a client-centric focus is not the right approach for the small business owner.  As one of my clients delicately put it a while back “Don’t ever confuse us clients with your friends.”  Before you get frothy, please bear with me for a moment.

Many of my clients are great friends.  But that’s not the point.  The responsibility, nay the duty, of a small business owner is to be kiddie-centric.  Clients come and go, but your kids are going to be messing up your house for the rest of your life.  (Or messing up your life for the rest of your house, whichever comes first.)

They are a lot more forgiving.  They are unlikely to abandon you when you mess up, or at least for as long as you have money to share.

In my case, until just a few years ago, every waking moment was spent on business.  I rather liked the challenge.  I still do. And frankly, it’s so much easier a challenge than preparing children for life.

But my biggest regret is that I didn’t get to put my kids to sleep every night they would have let me because I was too busy travelling, or too busy coding, or too busy in meetings, or too busy doing a bunch of thngs that seemed more urgent, but were nowhere near as important.  My children assure me that “it’s okay dad”.  But it isn’t really.  Maybe they didn’t miss it.  But I did.

Nowadays, when Mrs Carruthers and I go to any school gatherings with young Ms Carruthers, it is tacitly assumed that Danielle is accompanied by her mother and her grandfather.  When I was about 30 I met a man older than 50 who told me exactly what I’m telling you.  I ignored the best advice I ever got because I was too busy to believe him. In hindsight I think that 30 year old version of me was a prat. (I have no shortage of clients happy to confirm this.)

As I write this I’m listening to some vintage Rolling Stones.  Each song brings back a memory of a person, a relationship.  I have no idea what my bank balance was at the time that I heard each song for the first time.  And I don’t know what business was like.  But the people, them I remember.

So, for this last e-mail of 2011, may I humbly beg you to follow the only real piece of good advice I can give you this year? Take the time to put your kids to sleep over Christmas, and – what the heck – throughout next year.  That investment is safer, more guaranteed, and will generate better returns forever than anything else you could possibly do.

Except, maybe, taking the time to put your partner to bed every now and then as well. That’s also whole heap of fun, it turns out, and you won’t be kicked in the nuts as often.

You don’t actually have to prepare them life. Just loving them is enough preparation – for both parties. And it sure is a lot more fun.

At the risk of cheapening the point, when your family takes strain, when your relationships are in turmoil, you might as well forget about business until you find balance.  Relationships are more important than anything else.

And finally, don’t ever think that your kids are interested in the money. They aren’t. They don’t care, at least while they still want you close by when they sleep. They quite like you, though, so matter how tough things might seem to you, they just want to play. Try it. It’s kinda fun! There will be enough time for clients next year.

God Jul (Merry Christmas) and best wishes for 2012. We’ll talk again in January. Thanks for a fun 2011.

No Comments »

How to tell someone his website sucks?

November 24th, 2011 | by | marketing

Nov
24

How do you tell somebody that his website sucks? One of my partners asked me this question this week.

It is a question salespeople face each time they talk to a prospect about buying a new service or product. There is the belief that they must deep-six the status quo to get action.

The simple answer is that you don’t.  The key is to get some context: Find out what the reasoning was behind that first effort.

Nobody offers their worst efforts on purpose. But often the results don’t turn out quite the way we expected.

Which reminds me. My email last week prompted a stream of emails asking if my wife really had left me. I think it was making mention of my office being left on the porch. Mrs Carruthers has asked me to assure you that I am still welcome in her bed, but that Steve, Linus, and Bill cannot join us any longer.

As for that website we were talking about earlier? Every website has parents. These are the designers who built it and the owners who commissioned it. And they did the best they could with the resources they had. At worst we can suggest that it might have been built as a corporate brochure rather than a tuned sales instrument.

At Sales Motor we put your products and services on the front pages of search engines so that you get streams of great prospects. I think we are the only agency in SA that guarantees enquiries, and we even train clients to convert those enquiries into sales. Most firms don’t think beyond the clicks.

That means my partner does not have to say anything about the present site. We won’t be using it anyway. All he has to do is ask how many enquiries came from that site last week, and how many of those prospects turned into clients. And then, of course, tell a few true stories.

Like how one of our clients asked us to do a campaign three weeks ago selling meat based food products. And how they sold 25 tons of it to Angola from just one of the first responses. And how they cleared the shelves of the factory outlet by the second weekend. For less than the cost of a single small ad in Farmers Weekly.

Or how a client selling office space made R100,000 in countrywide commissions in the first ten days of starting with us. For less than the price of a single ad in a single newspaper for a single day.

Or how a plastics factory has taken 123 enquiries worth more than R60 million in the past three weeks. (Over 150,000 units x R400 each). For somewhat less than they pay the top half of one of their drivers.

As a salesperson, telling somebody that what they did in the past sucks is a really bad way to inspire them. We have each done a bunch of things in our past that we would rather forget. Mapping out a future with great prospects is a much better way to share ideas.

Finally, if you are advertising already, the 40 partners at Sales Motor would love to talk to you about getting a hell of a lot more bang for your buck. Please go to Sales Motor and tell us what you sell, where you’re advertising right now, and where you are based. One of us in your area will get back to you fast. (Having partners countrywide also means that we can accept payment in almost any form.)

Or check out the activity at some of our clients sites here. (The lines highlighted in green identify enquirors, rather than just searchers (clicks)).

No Comments »

Inferiority Complexes.

November 17th, 2011 | by | entrepreneurial life

Nov
17

One of the biggest challenges for us micro-business owners (self-employed) is that we tend to work from home. 

On the one hand it is cheap, comfortable, and a cold beer is never too far away. On the other hand we turn into hobbits.

It is easier to explain if I look at it from an expat perspective. Arrive in Britain or Norway, for instance, and you see all these folk dashing about looking busy, effective, and professional. It is, to be honest, a little disheartening, and we are tempted to feel rather inferior.

At least until we get to while away some time working amongst these titans of commerce. And then we find out that it is all smoke and mirrors. They’re as confused as we are, if not more so. (We Saffers tend to be quicker problem solvers because we know that otherwise we won’t be eating tonight. The socialist locals know that no matter how little they do Dave or Jens will bail them out at month end.)

I found all of this out when my wife kicked me out of the house a few months ago. I cannot repeat her exact words because they were loud and in Norwegian which I still struggle with. But her intent became clearer when I came out of the bathroom one morning to find my office neatly outside on the porch.

A few days later I moved into a small glass-walled office down the cliff at the local boat harbour. I have one of 9 offices surrounding a central area with a Nespresso machine. (Guess what clinched the deal.) 

I feel like a voyeur because I can watch all of the activity around me. Norwegians at the office, I must gently say, are a lot less impressive than them cross country skiers using the freeway to practice when the snow has not yet arrived. (We expect it today. This is not because today is special, it is just that we always expect it today, no matter what the date is. Norwegians love snow.)

Now, about that activity. Well, there isn’t much. Norwegians, like Brits and my fellow countrymen, glare at their screens, pick their noses, scratch their ears, vanish for long lunches, and leave early on Fridays. In between they look glum because no sales are coming in, and when a real live prospect approaches, well, they mess it up just like the rest of us. 

So, a hint if ever you find yourself in a new place. (That could be a new country, or in SA, a new province – which is just like a new country.) Go find an office to work out of for a few months. get to see how impressive the locals really are at close quarters.

And then start working from home before the snow arrives, even if that means losing the wife. Even she cannot be colder than the local weather between November and April.

No Comments »

Why we Ignore Looming Change.

October 27th, 2011 | by | entrepreneurial life

Oct
27

Seth Godin wrote this week about how new technology affects our businesses. He suggests that instead of asking ourselves how we can adapt this new way of doing things to our own efforts, we rather ask “how will this technology undermine our efforts”. Undermine, in this context, is in the sense of a sinkhole appearing in the middle of the M1.

It struck a chord. A while ago I wrote about webinars hurting conference venues. Owners of venues and event organisers assured me that I was wrong. Yet, over the past five years, I have done more than 1000 hours of profitable live online training, but less than 50 hours of live seminars. It turns out that lot of other trainers are going down this path. And the more people who attend online, the more who start to use it for themselves.

I have a South African friend who trains techies. He used to fly around the world doing his training in situ. (Highly techie field.) After joining one of our webinars, he began to ask how many of his clients would prefer the online process, rather than paying for him to be there. That was 18 months ago. Last month he invoiced more than R1,000,000, training people around the world through webinars, without leaving home. (That means that none of that money was paid to venues, hotels, car hire companies, airlines, or printers – all of whom normally take a large chunk of that income.)

I contrast his results with the response I get each time I talk to a teacher about webinars. “Yes, but, what about the personal relationship.” And in that single statement they discard the future of teaching.

Frankly, I think that relationship means a lot more to the teacher than it does to the person sitting behind the desk. Who can recall an hour of Latin with Wesley Francis without a shudder? Classrooms are great for people who need to be forced to learn. But for those folk who have their own drive, they are hell.

Each of us who is inside an industry looks at it from inside our own box. Webinars won’t work for a group of four-year-old kids. But, they are an godsend for people under time pressure, or for deep training of smaller groups, or for impromptu groups. (Venues and impromptu are mutually exclusive concepts.) And these are the folk who make up a lot of the seminar market.

Let’s forget training for a moment. Let’s look at Google Translate. I use it because I am grappling with Norwegian. As do most of the others in my class. (Polish, Russian, Polish, French, Filipino, Polish, Iraqi, Thai, and Polish.). Google Translate does a fine job of quickly turning Norsk into English, or Russian or Polish. It is a fine tool.

When I am lost, which is very often, I type in the entire text of the letter that’s arrived with a large official stamp, or the website I am looking at, or the newspaper I am reading. Google Translate gives me fine rendition in English. Not perfect, but close enough.

When I speak to a Norwegian about the subject (and more recently a German Ph.D.) she bursts out laughing about how bad Google Translate is. And then she regales me with a tale about how some or other local idiom gets translated literally rather than rendering its true meaning.. (“He laughed his lungs out” being the German example, which means “he stubbed his toe”, I think)

In getting lost in that one tiny error, she discards a tool that the rest of us idiots use daily. And the world has no shortage of us idiots creatively playing with our tools as we dream of world conquest.

Which gets me to thinking. Maybe we shouldn’t be looking at what our competitors are doing. They aren’t doing anything that we are not, other than maybe doing it better.

Maybe we should be looking at what complete strangers are doing because they are not locked in by our history. They are taking a complete new look at what we do, and seeing it for what it is: Quaint in an olde worlde way, and ripe for change.

No Comments »

Word-of-Mouth

October 12th, 2011 | by | marketing

Oct
12

Whenever I talk to some intrepid entrepreneur about finding clients, often a few months before I talk to them about closing their business, they assure me that they don’t need to do any marketing because all of their clients arrive by word-of-mouth.

This is a prime example of a problem known as confirmation bias.  Of course all of their clients arrive by word-of-mouth.  That’s because they’re not doing any other marketing, so there is no other way for clients to arrive.

Just in case this isn’t obvious, it is very unlikely that a person will call in response to the wireless ad that my intrepid friend did not arrange, or the magazine advert that he didn’t place, or the flyer at the traffic light that he did not hand out,  or the website that he doesn’t have.

That’s not the way he sees it.  Rather, he interprets the results to mean that he is so darn good that his past clients are referring him.  It is easy to make this mistake.  After all, 100% of his new clients are indeed the result of word-of-mouth, even if there are not enough of them to cover the watery soup and gruel he has come to enjoy.

Now, I don’t know about you, but I’m not the kind of guy who, at the dinner table, waxes lyrical about the service I have received from a plumber, ISP, car salesmen, or   bespoke PHP coder, unlike, it seems, women using OMO. That’s often because their service is nothing to write home about.

Facebook has added a new high-speed layer to the concept of word-of-mouth, not that any of my interviewees is using it.  But, frankly, I must admit to having a few problems with Facebook at the moment.   It was once a superb place to stay in touch with my family.  Now I am bombarded by word-of-mouth messages that have been engineered by Filipino copywriters for every man and his poodle, including Coca-Cola and Weetabix.

I am not sure that I want my clients and partners to know that my granddaughter is expecting triplets sired by a passing swagman, especially if they hear about it before I do. Facebook is very good at that.

No matter where I look I am prompted to “like” something, which apparently gives the “likee” the right to assail me with yet more Filipino writing.  And, Lord forbid that my finger innocently slips onto an advert for a dating site which Facebook has put on my front page. Within seconds, all of my friends see that same advert with a picture of a good-looking young man, and a note at the bottom assuring them that Peter Carruthers likes it.  I might do.  But not him. I just do not want quite that level of word-of-mouth sharing.

Relying on word-of-mouth is, I think, a dreadful way to sell your services and products.  Especially at a time when the world economy is tightening, and the competitors are getting a lot hungrier.  I think this is the universe telling us to bring our First Team to the market.

No Comments »

Employers and Employees.

October 10th, 2011 | by | entrepreneurial life

Oct
10

“My fondest hope is for world peace.” This is what all beauty queens say. Including Sandra Bullock. And “my people are my biggest asset” is what all businesses are fond of saying, often just before firing 15 percent of said biggest asset.

But any person running a small business needs to work from another rule book. Our role ensures that we will only ever hire staff who don’t fit well, and then look after them in a way that ensures that we will get the worst from them that they can offer.

I might be generalising, but after working with more than 30,000 SMMEs over the past 20 years, I can count on the fingers of my left foot the number of ventures with great staff, doing great work, and having real fun.

I was thinking about this after reading Mike Schüssler’s economic report about the sad lot of entrepreneurs in South Africa. Who would have thought that you and I, on average, earn less than the 22-year-old sweeping the floors of a govt toilet block. And that’s not allowing time off to toyi-toyi about greedy rich capitalists like you and me.

As I see it, the reason we battle with staff issues is simple. A big company knows the risk when it employs a new person. So it does it with extreme care. It defines the role, detailing the exact skills needed. It then takes as much time as is needed to find the right person, with an expert team to meet each hopeful new staff member. This means that they cull from the list the axe murderers, light-fingered accounting staff, and those people whose Ph.D. is not really from Oxford in the UK, but rather from the Oxford Online University in Ulan Bator.

Before the new staff member joins, he/she then signs an employment contract that gives the company all legal rights possible, and the staff member none. (This is the reward for being a “our biggest asset” staff member.)

One must contrast this with Mike Microbusiness. He knows that he needs help only when he starts working 25/8 instead his usual 24/7. He doesn’t employ a person with some expert skills that he doesn’t have, a person who can add more value than Mike is paying. He employs a person to share the pain. Instead of focusing on the right things to do, he adds an overhead to try and finish all the things he should not be doing.

It’s simple to qualify for employment at Mike’s. You need to be breathing, with at least one leg. The leg, of course, is optional as long as you can start next week.

Mike doesn’t have the knowledge, reserves, or cash to do any real evaluation, and often employs the first person to arrive that doesn’t look like his grandmother.

Then Mike throws as much of his load at her as he can. This is, I’m afraid to say, not a well thought out process. The employment contract, if it exists at all, is verbal. (“Gosh darn, I know I should have got that signed when she joined,” is one of the refrains I see on business Forums everyday.)

According to Mike Schussler, most Mikes earn less than most of their employees, for taking all of the risk. And when things go wrong – and 96 percent of the time they go wrong in the first 10 years – Mike’s staff will still hate him for letting them down.

I am a little embarrassed to say that that is why I now live the life that I do. When my business closed, I lost everything. My staff each had to find new work, and hated me for that. I had to find R2million to cover the debts incurred in not firing them much, much sooner.

Now, I don’t employ staff. I didn’t used to have an office, but my children drove me to drink too early in the day, so I now rent office space month by month. No surety. I have a partner, but he lives two countries away, which is far enough away for both of us to be happy. I automate as much as I can. And each thing that I can’t automate I humanate. (This is handing the work to online freelancers in India or some other warm place where people don’t earn a lot of money.)

I don’t drive a smart car because I don’t have to impress clients. I don’t wear a suit because I don’t even have to see clients.

All of which means I don’t need nearly as much money to survive as I used to. And I don’t run nearly as many risks as I used to. And maybe, just maybe, I will finally get to retire in the next five years, which has been my dream for the past 30 years, a little like a carrot in front of this donkey.

No Comments »

Business And Climate Change

October 4th, 2011 | by | life

Oct
04

May I share with you why I think the Earth is screwed?

If you watch the news for just one day you will see that money and related issues take up 90% of every broadcast. It’s the Greek crisis, it’s the fact that economies worldwide are not growing, and it’s the stock markets. These are the urgent issues of the day.

And these issues resonate with us. After all, if the stock market in Ho Chi Minh City is down 43% how on earth are we going to pay our bills at the end of this month? And there is nothing quite so urgent as this months bills.

So, economic growth is important. If you listen to the words that our leaders use, they keep talking about helping us consume more. And if we have no money, they will find a way to lend money to us to help us consume more, whether we need to or not. (They do not yet have that money, but hope it will come from the taxes our consumption will generate.)

Climate change doesn’t make nearly as much news. Nor is the news nearly as focused, because nobody really knows what the problem is, or even if there is one.

The fact that you and I have, in the past 50 years, eaten our way through the Earth’s resources in much the same way as a swarm of locusts goes through an acre of wheat, is not urgent. I think it is the most biggest issue that mankind has ever faced, but it sure is not urgent. We have to pay the bills first.

That’s the first problem. We humans deal with urgent issues first, which doesn’t leave much time for the important things.

There is a second issue. Those bills that you face at the end of this month are obviously yours. Either you have signed bits of paper that make them yours, or you have spent far too much money on shiraz, woman, song and a new flatscreen this month. It is your job to make things right.

But who must fix climate change? (I am assuming that there is such a thing, and for the purposes of this email that’s good enough.) Any problem which we all own – the “commons” such as polluted air or polluted sea – is also owned by none of us. As long as we can blame “them”, or expect “them” to fix it, we can hide away from it.

Why are these two issues so crucial to us?

Well, economic growth demands more intensive use of the earths resources. Any attempt to reduce climate change demands less intensive use of the earths resources.

Economic growth is urgent. Climate change is merely important. (And if climate change isn’t important, the fact that we are using all of the helium, oil, iron, fish, etc might bother our grandchildren when they go cold and hungry 50 years hence.)

No Comments »